$(function() {
$('#container-1').tabs();
$('#container-2').tabs(2);
$('#container-3').tabs({ fxSlide: true });
$('#container-4').tabs({ fxFade: true, fxSpeed: 'fast' });
$('#container-5').tabs({ fxSlide: true, fxFade: true, fxSpeed: 'normal' });
$('#container-6').tabs({
fxFade: true,
fxSpeed: 'fast',
onClick: function() {
alert('onClick');
onHide: function() {
alert('onHide');
onShow: function() {
alert('onShow');
$('#container-7').tabs({ fxAutoHeight: true });
$('#container-8').tabs({ fxShow: { height: 'show', opacity: 'show' }, fxSpeed: 'normal' });
$('#container-9').tabs({ remote: true });
$('#container-10').tabs();
$('#container-11').tabs({ disabled: [3] });
:<font color="#-52&&&&
机构投资者持股压力下证券分析师乐观倾向研究
朱卫东1, 王丽娜2, 沈洁2
1. 合肥工业大学经济学院, 安徽 合肥 230009;
2. 合肥工业大学管理学院, 安徽 合肥 230009
Optimism in Security Analysts' Recommendations under Institutional Investors' Holding Pressure
ZHU Wei-dong1, WANG Li-na2, SHEN Jie2
1. School of Economics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 23009, C
2. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 23009, China
摘要&荐股评级出现乐观倾向，是当前全球证券分析师行业存在的一个突出问题。基于欺诈三角理论，本研究从压力、机会和合理化解释三方面对分析师荐股评级乐观倾向成因进行了理论分析，并以年间中国证券分析师发布的21054个荐股评级数据为研究对象进行了实证检验。结果表明机构投资者持股比例越高，证券分析师越倾向于发布乐观的评级报告，而且在乐观评级情况下，分析师所推荐股票达到或者超过其预测的概率越高。本文的研究有利于投资者更为科学地审视分析师的荐股评级，并为监管部门提供政策参考。
<INPUT type=hidden value="我在《中国管理科学》上发现了关于“证券分析师|荐股评级|机构投资者|乐观倾向”几篇好文章，特向您推荐。请点击下面的网址：" name=neirong>
作者相关文章
Abstract：
Optimism existing in stock recommendation is a prominent problem in present global security analyst industry. Based on the fraud triangle theory, the causes are analyzed theoretically from the viewpoints of pressure, chance and rationalized explanation in this research, and then empirical tests based on the 21054 collected recommendation samples issued by Chinese security analysts during 2010 to 2012 are carried out. Results show that the higher of institutional investors holding, the more likely analysts will release optimistic recommendations, and moreover, the higher probability of recommended stock reaching or exceeding their forecast. This research facilitates investors' scientific inspection to analysts' recommendations and provides a reference to regulatory authorities.
收稿日期: ;
基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目（J970058）；中国证券业协会2010重点研究课题资助项目（10-645）
通讯作者 王丽娜(1973-),女(汉族),安徽凤阳人,合肥工业大学管理学院,讲师,研究方向:会计信息与决策、风险管理,E-mail:.&&&
引用本文: &&
.机构投资者持股压力下证券分析师乐观倾向研究[J]& 中国管理科学, ): 45-52
Savaska R C,Van Wassenhove L N.Reverse channel design:The case of competing retailers[J]. Management Science, ) :1-14.
Cheng C C J,Yang C,Sheu C.The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, ): 81-90.
Agrawal V V, Ferguson M, Toktay L B, et al. Is leasing greener than selling?[J]. Management Science, ):523-533.
Serrano-Cinca C, Fuertes-Call&n Y, Mar-Molinero C. Measuring DEA efficiency in Internet companies [J]. Decision Support Systems,):557-573.
Phylipsen G J M, Blok W, Worrell E. Handbook on international comparisons of energy efficiency in the manufacturing industry[M]. Netherlands: Utrecht University, 1998.
Kucukmehmetoglu M, Guldmann J. International water resources allocation and conflicts: The case of the Euphrates and Tigris[J]. Environment & Planning A, ):783-801.
Mola S, Guidolin M. Affiliated mutual funds and analyst optimism[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, ): 108-137.
Gawer A. Platforms, markets and innovation[M]. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.
Ferguson M,Toktay L B.The effect of competition on recovery strategies[J]. Product and Operations Management,):351-368.
Przychodzen J, Przychodzen W. Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance-evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, -263.
Runkel M. Optimal emissions taxation under imperfect competition in a durable good industry[J]. Bulletin of Economic Research, ):115-132.
Min S, Wolfinbarger M. Market share, profit margin, and marketing efficiency of early movers, bricks and clicks, and specialists in e-commerce [J]. Journal of Business Research,):.
Boyd G A, Pang J X. Estimating the linkagebetween energy efficiency and productivity[J]. Energy Policy, ): 289-296.
Kennedy P W. Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, ):49-63.
Firth M, Lin Chen, Liu Ping, Xuan Yuhai. The client is king: do mutual fund relationship bias analyst recommendations[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, ): 165-199.
华中生. 网络环境下的平台服务及其管理问题[J].管理科学学报,) :1-12.
邱甲贤, 林漳希, 童牧. 第三方电子交易平台运营初期的定价策略&&基于在线个人借贷市场的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, ): 57-65.
张卫东, 耿笑. 基于三方博弈模型的网络交易平台收费机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, ): 135-141.
徐和, 何燕, 马士华. 基于网络零售平台的激励合同研究[J]. 中国管理科学, ): 79-84.
张海燕,邵云飞.基于阶段门的企业主动环境技术创新战略选择实施分析&&以四川宏达集团有限公司为例[J]. 研究与发展管理,):106-115.
朱庆华,夏西强,王一雷.政府补贴下低碳与普通产品制造商竞争研究[J]. 系统工程学报, ):008.
董颖,石磊.波特假说[J]. 生态学报,):1-16.
肖迪,黄培清.基于不对称信息的闭环供应链激励机制[J]. 工业工程与管理,):11-14.
黄祖庆,易荣华,达庆利.第三方负责回收的再制造闭环供应链决策结构的效率分析[J]. 中国管理科学,):73-77.
Desai P S, Koenigsberg O, Purohit D. The role of production lead time and demand uncertainty in marketing durable goods[J]. Management Science, ):150-158.
范群林,邵云飞,唐小我.中国汽车产业环境技术创新影响因素实证研究[J]. 管理学报,):.
谭德庆,高永全.耐用品二手市场信息对垄断厂商决策影响研究[J]. 系统工程学报,):446-453.
王月辉,王青.北京居民新能源汽车购买意向影响因素-基于TAM和TPB整合模型的研究[J]. 中国管理科学,):691-698.
Dehning B, Richardson V J. Returns on investments in information technology: A research synthesis [J]. Journal of Information Systems,):7-30.
Porter M E. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance [M].Hong Kong:Free Press,1985.
Hu Jin-li, Wang S C. Total factor energy efficiency of regions in China[J]. Energy Policy, ): .
Damania R. Environmental regulation and financial structure in an oligopoly supergame[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, ):119-129.
Ljungqvist A, Marston F, Starks L T. Conflicts of interest in sell-side research and the moderating role of institutional investors[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, ): 420-456.
Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, ): 668-691.
Arag&n-Correa J A. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment[J]. Academy of management Journal,):556-567.
Ferrer G.,Swaminathan J M. Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, ): 370-379.
Xu Xiaowei, Hopp WJ. A monopolistic and oligopolistic stochastic flow revenue management model[J]. Operation Research, ):.
Coase R H. The nature of the firm [J]. Economica,):386-405.
Zenkevich N, Zyatchin A. Strong nash equilibrium in a repeated environmental engineering game with stochastic dynamics[C]// Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Game Theory and Applications, Qingdao, September, .
Chen Shuping, Matsumoto D A. Favorable versus unfavorable recommendations: The impact on analyst access to management-provided information[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, ): 657-689.
Schmalensee R. Why is platform pricing generally highly skewed?[J]. Review of Network Economics, ): 1-11.
赵书新.节能减排政府补贴激励政策设计的机理研究. 北京:北京交通大学,2011.
孙浩,达庆利.基于产品差异的再制造闭环供应链定价与协调研究[J]. 管理学报,):733-738.
曹俊,熊中楷,刘莉莎.闭环供应链中新件制造商和再制造商的价格及质量水平竞争[J]. 中国管理科学,) :82-90.
颜荣芳,程永宏,王彩霞.再制造闭环供应链最优差别定价模型[J]. 中国管理科学,):90-97.
张克勇,吴燕,侯世旺.具公平关切零售商的闭环供应链差别定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学,):51-58.
Lin KY, Sibdari SY. Dynamic price competition with discrete customer choices[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, ):969-980.
汪克亮, 杨宝臣, 杨力. 基于环境效应的中国能源效率与节能减排潜力分析[J]. 管理评论, ):40-50.
李金铠, 沈波, 韩亚峰, 等. 中国区域能源效率比较-基于DEA_Malmquist和聚类分析[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), ):1-6.
F&re R, Svensson L. Congestion of production factors [J]. Econometrica,):.
Yanase A. Global environment and dynamic games of environmental policy in an international duopoly[J]. Journal of Economics, ):121-140.
张乐,王慧敏,佟金萍.突发水灾害应急合作的行为博弈模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学,):92-97.
刘利源,时政勗,宁立新.非对称国家越境污染最优控制模型[J]. 中国管理科学,):43-49.
Hong H, Kubik J. Analyzing the Analysts: Career Concerns and Biased Earnings Forecasts[J]. Journal of Finance, ): 313-351.
姚禄仕,何方,王丽娜,等. 利益冲突下的证券分析师跟进行为研究-基于面板数据的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学,): 43-49.
Nejad M G. Optimal pricing for the growth of innovations with direct network externalities: An agent-based approach[J]. Journal of Product & Brand Management, ):180-190.
杨仕辉, 魏守道. 出口补贴还是出口征税?&&碳关税背景下贸易政策及实施时机选择的博弈分析[J]. 国际经贸探索, ):39-51.
张国兴,张绪涛,程素杰,等.节能减排补贴政策下的企业与政府信号博弈模型[J]. 中国管理科学,):129-136.
董颖.企业生态创新的机理研究 [M]. 杭州:浙江大学出版社,2013.
Mitra S, petition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, ): 287-298.
Perakis G, Sood A. Competitive multi-period pricing for perishable products: A robust optimization approach[J]. Mathematical Programming, ):295-335.
马海良, 黄德春, 姚惠泽. 中国三大经济区域全要素能源效率研究-基于超效率DEA模型和Malmquist指数[J]. 中国人口&资源与环境, ):38-43.
赵金楼, 李根, 苏屹,等. 我国能源效率地区差异及收敛性分析&&基于随机前沿分析和面板单位根的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, ): 175-184.
蔡圣华, 杜立民, 毕清华. 我国提高能源效率的目标设计[J]. 中国管理科学, ):152-160.
Odeck J. Congestion, ownership, region of operation, and scale: Their impact on bus operator performance in Norway [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,):52-69.
Qu Yufei. The evolutionary game analysis on water pollution control strategy of basin local governments: A case of the south-to-north water transfer project[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management, ):35-39.
李光青. 机构投资者、社会网络与乐观评级推荐[D]. 上海:上海财经大学,2011.
王瑞. 基金重仓对分析师行为的影响及其经济后果[D]. 上海:复旦大学,2013.
万兴, 高觉民. 纵向差异化双边市场中平台策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, ): 934-941.
王明喜,王明荣,汪寿阳.最优减排策略及其实施的理论分析[J]. 管理评论,):42-47.
Aksen D, Aras N, Karaarslan A G.Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, ):308-327.
王文宾,达庆利. 奖惩机制下电子类产品制造商回收再制造决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学,):57-63.
王文宾,达庆利.考虑政府引导的电子类产品逆向供应链奖惩机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学,):62-67.
王文宾,达庆利.奖惩机制下闭环供应链的决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学,):36-41.
贡文伟,李虎,梅强. 政府引导下的逆向供应链契约设计[J]. 运筹与管理,):242-249.
王文宾,达庆利.奖惩机制下具竞争制造商的废旧产品回收决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学,):50-56.
余福茂,钟永光,沈祖志.考虑政府引导激励的电子废弃物回收处理决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学,):131-137.
Mart&nez-de-Alb&niz V, Talluri K. Dynamic price competition with fixed capacities[J]. Management Science, ):.
Choi Y, Zhang Ning, Zhou Peng. Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure[J]. Applied Energy, ):198-208.
Khodabakhshi M. A one-model approach based on relaxed combinations of inputs for evaluating input congestion in DEA [J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,):443-450.
Khodabakhshi M, Lotfi F H, Aryavash K. Review of input congestion estimating methods in DEA [J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics,.
Suzuki Y, Iwasa Y. Conflict between groups of players in coupled socio-economic and ecological dynamics[J]. General Information, ):.
姜姝. 利益冲突对分析师盈利预测的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程,): .
吴超鹏,郑方镳,杨世杰. 证券分析师的盈余预测和股票评级是否具有独立性?[J]. 经济学(季刊),):935-958.
Hinz O, Hann I H, Spann M. Price discrimination in e-commerce? An examination of dynamic pricing in name-your-own price markets[J]. MIS quarterly, ): 81-98.
Lefebvre E,Lefebvre L A,Talbot S.Determinants and impacts of environmental performance in SMEs[J]. R＆D Management,):263-283.
Liu Qian, Zhang Dan. Dynamic pricing competition with strategic customers under vertical product differentiation [J]. Management Science, ):84-101.
Bian Yiwen, Hu Miao, Wang Yousen, et al. Energy efficiency analysis of the economic system in China during : A parallel slacks-based measure approach[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 0-998.
Marques R C, Sim&es P. Measuring the influence of congestion on efficiency in worldwide airports [J]. Journal of Air Transport Management,):334-336.
Chen Y. Congestion in commodity trading advisors [J]. INFOR,), 63-74.
Wang Hongwei, Cai Lingru, Zeng Wei. Research on the evolutionary game of environmental pollution in system dynamics model[J]. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, ):39-50.
McNichols M F, O'Brien P C. Self-selection and analyst coverage[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1997, 35(Supplement): 167-199.
Hagiu A, Halaburda H. Information and two-sided platform profits[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, ): 25-35.
Porter M E, van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship[J]. The journal of economic perspectives,):97-118.
曾贤刚.减排的经济学分析(第1版) [M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2011.
Chen Yiwei, Farias V F. Simple policies for dynamic pricing with imperfect forecasts[J]. Operations Research, ):612-624.
Meng Ming, Shang Wei, Zhao Xiaoli, et al. Decomposition and forecasting analysis of China's energy efficiency: An application of three-dimensional decomposition and small-sample hybrid models[J]. Energy, ):366-369.
陈志松,王慧敏,仇蕾,等.流域水资源配置中的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学,):176-183.
吴瑞明,胡代平,沈惠璋.流域污染治理中的演化博弈稳定性分析[J]. 系统管理学报,):797-801.
贾敬全,卜华,姚圣.基于演化博弈的环境信息披露监管研究[J]. 华东经济管理,):145-148.
潘峰,西宝,王琳.地方政府间环境规制策略的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国人口&资源与环境,):97-102.
李胜,陈晓春. 基于府际博弈的跨行政区流域水污染治理困境分析[J]. 中国人口&资源与环境,):104-109.
李雪松,孙博文.大气污染治理的经济属性及政策演进:一个分析框架[J]. 改革.-25.
Flegg A T, Allen D O. Congestion in the Chinese automobile and textile industries revisited [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,):177-191.
王宇熹,肖峻,陈伟忠. 我国证券分析师推荐报告投资价值实证研究&&以上海申银万国证券研究所为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,): 214-219.
Copyright 2010 by 中国管理科学 推荐期刊投稿
&&&免费论文
&&&收费论文
&&&浏览历史 上传我的文档
 下载
 收藏
该文档贡献者很忙，什么也没留下。
 下载此文档
正在努力加载中...
券分析师利益关系、盈余预测与评级偏差
下载积分：2000
内容提示：券分析师利益关系、盈余预测与评级偏差
文档格式：PDF|
浏览次数：0|
上传日期： 09:32:24|
文档星级：
该用户还上传了这些文档
券分析师利益关系、盈余预测与评级偏差
官方公共微信 上传我的文档
 下载
 收藏
该文档贡献者很忙，什么也没留下。
 下载此文档
正在努力加载中...
【精品】盈余预测与证券分析师独立性研究
下载积分：1300
内容提示：【精品】盈余预测与证券分析师独立性研究
文档格式：PDF|
浏览次数：0|
上传日期： 05:30:19|
文档星级：
该用户还上传了这些文档
【精品】盈余预测与证券分析师独立性研究
官方公共微信
