Simultaneous serum desalting and total protein determination by macroporous reversed-phase chromatography | SpringerLink
This service is more advanced with JavaScript available, learn more at http://activatejavascript.org
Advertisement
Simultaneous serum desalting and total protein determination by macroporous reversed-phase chromatographyAlexander BoichenkoNatalia GovorukhinaAte G. J. van der ZeeRainer BischoffOriginal Paper
Macroporous reversed-phase (mRP) chromatography was successfully used to develop an accurate and precise method for total protein in serum. The limits of detection (0.83 μg, LOD) and quantification (2.51 μg, LOQ) for the mRP method are comparable with those of the widely used micro BCA protein assay. The mRP method can be used to determine the total protein concentration across a wide dynamic range by detecting chromatographic peaks at 215 nm and 280 nm. The method has the added advantage of desalting and denaturing proteins, leading to more complete digestion by trypsin and to better LC–MS–MS identification in shotgun proteomics experiments.
Figure Simultaneous Serum Desalting and Total Protein Determination with Macroporous Reversed-Phase Chromatography: calibration plots
Macroporous reversed-phase chromatography Serum Total protein concentration Desalting Digestion LC–MS–MS Proteomics This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.The authors acknowledge financial support from the University of Groningen, the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF, grant RUG ), and the Netherlands Proteomics Center (NPC, grant E1.3).1.Kanagasabapathy AS, Kumari S (2000) Guidelines on standard operating procedures for clinical chemistry. WHO, New Delhi2.Urdal P, Bolann B, Marstein S, Rustad P, Steensland H, ?sberg A (2004) Updated reference intervals for commonly analysed clinical biochemical components. Oppdaterte referanseintervaller for klinisk-kjemiske komponenter 124(11):3.Chrom? V, ?váchová L, Novosád L, Jarkovsk? J, Sedlák P, Horák P, Dobrovolná H, Hlavácová B (2009) Albumin-based or albumin-linked calibrators cause a positive bias in serum proteins assayed by the biuret method. Clin Chem Lab Med 47(1):91–1014.Tichy M, Friedecky B, Budina M, Maisnar V, Buchler T, Holeckova M, Gotzmannova D, Palicka V (2009) Interference of IgM-λ paraprotein with biuret-type assay for total serum protein quantification. Clin Chem Lab Med 47(2):235–2365.Okutucu B, D?n?er A, Habib ?, Z?hn?oglu F (2007) Comparison of five methods for determination of total plasma protein concentration. J Biochem Biophys Methods 70(5):709–711. doi:
6.Zaia DAM, Marques FR, Vieira Zaia CTB (2005) Spectrophotometric determination of total proteins in blood plasma: a comparative study among dye-binding methods. Braz Arch Biol Technol 48(3):385–3887.Baddini ALQ, da Cunha LER, de Oliveira AMC, Cassella RJ (2010) Determination of total protein in hyperimmune serum samples by near-infrared spectrometry and multivariate calibration. Anal Biochem 397(2):175–1808.Ho?af?? G, Klein O, Oremek G, M?ntele W (2007) Clinical chemistry without reagents? An infrared spectroscopic technique for determination of clinically relevant constituents of body fluids. Anal Bioanal Chem 387(5):. doi:
9.Perez-Guaita D, Ventura-Gayete J, Pérez-Rambla C, Sancho-Andreu M, Garrigues S, de la Guardia M Protein determination in serum and whole blood by attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 1–8. doi:
10.Jin F, Hickman JJ, Lenghaus K, Marcus RK (2004) Total protein determinations by particle beam/hollow cathode optical emission spectroscopy (PB/HC-OES) system Part 2. Improved sensitivity through use of silica micro-particles as carrier agents for enhanced particle transport. J Anal At Spectrom 19(9):11.Jin F, Hickman JJ, Lenghaus K, Marcus RK (2004) Total protein determinations by particle beam/hollow cathode optical emission spectroscopy (PB/HC-OES) system III: investigation of carrier salts for enhanced particle transport. Anal Bioanal Chem 380(2):204–211. doi:
12.Mertens M, Rittmeyer C, Kolbesen BO (2001) Evaluation of the protein concentration in enzymes via determination of sulfur by total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry — limitations of the method. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: At Spectrosc 56(11):. doi:
13.Davis R, Giguère S (2005) Evaluation of five commercially available assays and measurement of serum total protein concentration via refractometry for the diagnosis of failure of passive transfer of immunity in foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 227(10):14.Cai C, Chen X (2010) Determination of nanograms of proteins based on the amplified resonance light scattering signals of Tichromine. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 75(3):. doi:
15.Toyota T (1985) Determination of total protein in serum using a tyrosinase enzyme electrode. Anal Chem 57(9):16.Chuang M-C, Liu C-C, Yang M-C (2006) An electrochemical tyrosinase-immobilized biosensor for albumin—toward a potential total protein measurement. Sens Actuators B: Chem 114(1):357–363. doi:
17.Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alende R, Gude F, Campos J, Rey J, Meijide LM, Fernandez-Merino C, Vidal C (2008) Serum levels of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) in a general adult population and their relationship with alcohol consumption, smoking and common metabolic abnormalities. Clin Exp Immunol 151(1):42–50. doi:
18.Farrah T, Deutsch EW, Omenn GS, Campbell DS, Sun Z, Bletz JA, Mallick P, Katz JE, Malmstr?m J, Ossola R, Watts JD, Lin B, Zhang H, Moritz RL, Aebersold R (2011) A high-confidence human plasma proteome reference set with estimated concentrations in peptideAtlas. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(9)19.Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M (1996) Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 68(5):850–858. doi:
20.Horvatovich P, Hoekman B, Govorukhina N, Bischoff R (2010) Multidimensional chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry in analysing complex proteomics samples. J Sep Sci 33(10):21.Martosella J, Zolotarjova N, Liu H, Nicol G, Boyes BE (2005) Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic prefractionation of immunodepleted human serum proteins to enhance mass spectrometry identification of lower-abundant proteins. J Proteome Res 4(5):22.McCarthy J, Hopwood F, Oxley D, Laver M, Castagna A, Righetti PG, Williams K, Herbert B (2003) Carbamylation of proteins in 2-D electrophoresis – Myth or reality? J Proteome Res 2(3):239–242Alexander Boichenko1Natalia Govorukhina1Ate G. J. van der Zee2Rainer Bischoff11.Department of Analytical BiochemistryUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands2.University Medical Centre GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
Published in cooperation withprotein-peptide-hplc | China-Mainland | Sigma-Aldrich
Faster Protein and Peptide Liquid Chromatography (FP2LC)
By: Roy Eksteen, and Hillel Brandes, Reporter US Volume 32.1
Introducing BIOshell(TM) Fused-Core(R) U/HPLC Columns
A new and broad product line for the analysis of peptides and proteins by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) is introduced under the name BIOshell(TM) Fused-Core(R) U/HPLC columns. As the Ascentis(R) Express column line for the analysis of small molecular mass compounds, BIOshell columns outperform fully porous silica-based columns of the same particle size in terms of one or more important chroma such as efficiency, resolution, analysis time (speed) and back pressure. By providing faster peptide and protein liquid chromatography (FP2LC), the benefits of porous-shell columns are now also available to scientists who are tasked to advance our knowledge about the living world.
Background and Characteristics
The development of Fused-Core U/HPLC columns is based on the pellicular silica technology developed by J. J. Kirkland at E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company in the late 1960s during the formative years of HPLC, and applied in this century to create very efficient particles in the range of 2.7 to 5 micron. The latest innovations derived from this technology are now available as BIOshell Fused- Core columns for faster protein and peptide liquid chromatography (FP2LC) separations. BIOshell columns for peptide analysis are either packed with 2.7 or 5 micron particles containing 160 ? pores and bonded with a C18 alkyl or alkyl cyano functionality, while protein separations are best performed with 3.4 micron particles containing 400 ? pores bonded with C4 alkyl functional groups. The complete list of available BIOshell columns is provided at the end of this article.
In 2007 Supelco introduced the groundbreaking Ascentis Express Fused-Core column line for the analysis of compounds with low molecular mass. In the succeeding years it has become clear that (a) columns packed with 2.7 micron, 90 ? pore size, porous-shell particles provide a dramatic and unexpected improvement in column efficiency, rivaling the efficiency of columns packed with fully porous 1.7 micron particles, and (b) a paradigm shift had to take place in the minds of theoreticians to adjust the theory of chromatographic band broadening to account for column efficiencies that were, until then, considered outside the realm of possibility.
Like the particles in Ascentis Express columns, the particles in BIOshell columns are composed of a spherical solid glass core surrounded by a thin layer of nano- size silica particles. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics and maximum operating conditions of the new BIOshell porous-shell columns.
As shown in Table 1, to accommodate the larger size of biopolymers, the particles in BIOshell columns either feature160 ? pores for unhindered access by peptides up to a mass of about 20 kDa, or 400 ? pores for proteins with a molecular mass up to about 500 kDa. Note that the thickness of the porous shell varies as does the percentage of the surface area when compared to a fully porous particle of the same size. Thus, the 0.2 micron shell for the 3.4 micron particles results in a surface area that is 31% of a fully porous particle of that size. Similarly, the 0.5 micron shell for the 2.7 micron particle provides 75% of the maximum surface area, while the 0.6 micron shell for the nominally 5 micron but actually 4.7 micron particles contains 59% of the surface area of a fully porous particle. Although the loss of surface area may seem a cause of concern, Unger et al., first demonstrated that even nonporous matrices provide sufficient retention for larger biomolecules, while Gritti and Guiochon showed that the capacity of core-shell particles is not substantially reduced even for large biopolymers, a conclusion that was recently confirmed in a paper from Guillaume et al., who found that the loading capacity of a wide pore core-shell column was 2–3 fold less than that of a fully porous column.
Table 1 also shows the bonded phase characteristics, recommended pH range, and the highest values for back pressure and temperature at which each particle type was tested. While a maximum pressure of 600 bar or 9,000 psi may seem modest in current day UHPLC systems, a maximum operating temperature of 80–100 °C provides a degree of freedom that can be very beneficial, particularly when working with more hydrophobic proteins, including monoclonal antibodies, as will be illustrated in the following proof statements.
Table 1. Characteristics and Operating Conditions of BIOshell Fused-Core Columns
Nominal Values
Physical&Parameter
Shell (um)
vs. Porous
2.7&um&A160&Peptide&C18
2.7 um A160 Peptide CN
5 um A160 Peptide C18
5 um A160 Peptide CN
3.4 um A400 Protein C4
Phase Characteristics and Operating Conditions
Physical&Parameter
Bonded Phase Ligand
2.7&um&A160&Peptide&C18
di-isobutyl-octadecylsilane
2.7 um A160 Peptide CN
di-isopropyl-cyanopropylsilane
5 um A160 Peptide C18
di-isobutyl-octadecylsilane
5 um A160 Peptide CN
di-isopropyl-cyanopropylsilane
3.4 um A400 Protein C4
dimethylbutylsilane
The chromatogram in Figure 1 shows the analysis of IgG2-B subtype monoclonal antibody following solubilization and reduction of the sulfide bonds with 100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in 8 M guanidine HCl at 50 °C for 35 minutes. The main components in Figure 1 are the light (LC) and heavy (HC) chains of IgG2-B. The inset clearly shows several expected variants near the heavy chain peak, although the identity of the minor peaks was not confirmed. The analysis was performed at 80 °C based on the results from Dillon and co-workers at Amgen, which were more recently confirmed by other groups.
Figure 1. High Temperature Analysis of IgG2-B Antibody Fragments Using a 10 cm x 2.1 mm I.D. BIOshell A400 Protein C4 Column
CONDITIONS: column: BIOshell A400 Protein C4, 10 cm x 2.1 mm I.D., 3.4 um (Product No. ); mobile phase: A: water:0.1% TFA, B: acetonitrile:water:0.1% TFA, 80:20; gradient: 33-40% B in 10 flow rate: 0.25 mL/ temp: 80 °C; detection: 280 injection: 1 uL; sample: 0.5 mg/mL IgG2-B treated with 100 mM DDT in 8 M guanidine HCl at 50 °C for 35 instrument: Shimadzu(TM) Nexera(R)
Another example of the need to operate reversed-phase columns at high temperature is provided in Figure 2, in which a so-called middle-down, as opposed to a top-down or bottom-up, approach was used to analyze the structure of a monoclonal antibody. In a middle-down approach IgG is digested into a few large fragments prior to further characterization. The novel proteolytic enzyme IdeS, commercially available as FabRICATOR(R), cleaves an antibody into F(ab’)2 and scFc fragments, which have approximate molecular masses of 100 kDa and 25 kDa respectively. Using disulfide reduction, the F(ab’)2 fragment can be further resolved into its light-chain (LC) and F(ab) components. Each of the components in the resulting mixture has a molecular mass of about 25 kDa.
Visual inspection of the results shown in Figure 2 reveals that when run at 90 °C, the BIOshell A400 Protein C4 column (A) provides narrower peak widths and better peak shape than a competitive column packed with fully porous 3.5 micron particles (B). The same conclusion can be drawn from the results for two other competitive columns (C and D) which were operated at 80 °C, the highest temperature recommended by their manufacturer. The ability to operate BIOshell A400 Protein C4 columns at 90 °C provides a beneficial degree of flexibility for biochemists involved in the development and analysis of antibody-based biotherapeutic drugs.
Figure 2. Analysis of Antibody Fragments on Wide Pore Reverse-Phase Columns Operated at Maximum Recommended Temperature
CONDITIONS: column: as indicated, 10 cm x 2.1 mobile phase A: 80:20, (water, 0.1% TFA) : (acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA); mobile phase B: 50:50, (water, 0.1% TFA) : (acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA); gradient: 30 to 70% B in 12 flow: 0.3 mL/ column temp.: detection: UV, 215 injection: 1 uL, after sample diluted in mobile phase A
To determine the stability of columns packed with large pore Fused- Core particles with continued operation at high temperature and flow rate, five globular protein standards were repeatedly injected on a 10 cm x 2.1 mm I.D. BIOshell A400 Protein C4 column. The results are shown in Figure 3 for the first and last injection of an experiment in which the column was exposed to repeated 10 minute gradients from 25 to 40% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and a temperature of 90 °C. A noticeable but small loss of retention was observed for all proteins after the column had been in contact with almost 15,000 gradient column volumes (1 CV ~ 0.2 mL) at 90 °C under acidic (pH ~ 2.0) conditions. Note that the peak shape and peak widths of the test proteins did not change during the experiment, indicating excellent physical stability of BIOshell Fused-Core columns.
Figure 3. BIOshell A400 Protein C4: Column Stability
PEAK IDs: 1. Cytochrome c (12.4 kDa); 2. Lysozyme (14.3 kDa); 3. Apomyoglobin (17 kDa); 4. Catalase (250 kD tetramer of ~60 kDa each); 5. Enolase (93 kD dimer of 46.7 kDa each)
CONDITIONS: column: BIOshell A400, 10 cm x 2.1 mm 3.4 um (Product No. ); mobile phase A: water:0.1% TFA; mobile phase B: acetonitrile:0.1% TFA; gradient: 25-40% B in 10 flow rate: 0.5 mL/ column temp: 90 °C; detection: 215 injection: 1.0 uL; instrument: Shimadzu Nexera
In a final example, Figure 4 shows chromatograms of a mixture of 5 different tryptic digests (cytochrome c, β-lactoglobulin, glutamate dehydrogenase, carbonic anhydrase, myoglobin) run on both a 2.7 micron BIOshell A160 Peptide C18 column and a fully porous 5 micron C18 column of the same dimensions. The analyses were run at the same flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and with the same starting and final gradient mobile phase composition. However, to account for the smaller pore volume of the Fused-Core particles in the BIOshell column, the gradient times were adjusted so that each column was exposed to the same number of gradient column volumes, 46 in this case. About 20 peaks from across the chromatograms (Figure 4) were extracted from the MS data to serve as a representative sample in the calculation of the peak capacity (Pc) for each column, using the accepted definition Pc = gradient time/ average peak width. Peak widths were calculated at baseline for each of the 20 selected peptides. Table 2 lists the experimental values for the gradient time (tg) and the average peptide peak width (w) as well as the calculated peak capacity for this particular separation on each column.
The 2.7 um BIOshell column showed a 40% increase in peak capacity over the 5 micron Zorbax 300SB-C18 porous column which is in agreement with the results obtained by Gilar et al. who confirmed results from earlier workers that peak capacity is proportional to the square root of the plate number.
Figure 4. Peak Capacity of a Commercial Fused-Core and Fully Porous Reversed Column for a Peptide Digest Mixture
CONDITIONS: columns: as indicated, 15 cm x 2.1 mobile phase A: 0.1 % mobile phase B: 25:75, (0.4 % formic acid): gradient: as indicated (in terms of column volumes); flow rate: column temp.: 35 °C; det.: ESI(+)-TOF; injection: 2 uL; sample: 10 pmol / uL
Table 2. Calculated Peak Capacities
BIOshell A160 Peptide C18
Zorbax(R) SB300-C18
* Recall that the gradient volume is scaled to the same number of column volumes.
tg and w are units of minutes
Conclusions
The advances brought about by using porous shell particles with narrow particle size distribution for the analysis of small molecular weight compounds, commercially available as Ascentis Express columns, have been expanded to the reversed-phase U/HPLC analysis of peptides and proteins. As expected and demonstrated, larger pore size BIOshell Fused-Core columns provide benefits in terms of efficiency per unit pressure drop, which can either be taken advantage of by increasing peak capacity or traded in to reduce analysis time, benefits that are captured in the acronym FP2LC, or Faster Peptide and Protein Liquid Chromatography.
Trademarks
Fused-Core is a registered trademark of Advanced Materials Technology, Inc.
Ascentis is a registered trademark of Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC
BIOshell is a trademark of Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC
FabRICATOR is a registered trademark of Genovis AB
Shimadzu and Nexetra are registered trademarks of Shimadzu Corporation
Acknowledgment:
The authors thank Stephanie A. Schuster and Robert E. Moran from Applied Materials Technologies, Inc. for contributing Figures 1 and 3.
&References
Kirkland, J.J., US Patent 3,505,785. April 14, 1970. Superficially Porous Supports for Chromatography.
Kirkland, J.J., Langlois, T.J.; DeStefano, J.J., Am. Lab. 2007, 18-21. Fused-core particles for HPLC columns
Kuhn, T.S.; The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 50th Anniversary E University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1996; 264 pages.
Gritti, F.; Cavazzini, A.; Marchetti, N.; Guiochon, G. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 3. Comparison between the efficiencies of columns packed with fully and partially porous C18-bonded silica materials.
Unger, K.K., Jilge, G., Kinkel, J.N. and Hearn, M.T.W., J. Chromatogr. A, 1986, 359, 61-72. Evaluation of Advanced Silica packings for the Separation of Biopolymers by HPLC. II. Performance on Non-Porous Monodisperse 1.5 Micron Silica Beads in the Separation of Proteins by Reversed-Phase Gradient Elution HPLC
Gritti, F.; Guiochon, G. Chromatogr. A, 2007, 2. Comparison between the loading capacities of columns packed with partially and totally porous fine particles. What is the effective surface area available for adsorption?
Fekete, S.; Berky, R., Fekete, J.; Veutheya, J-L.; Guillarme, D.; J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 8. Evaluation of a new wide pore core-shell material (Aeris(R) WIDEPORE) and comparison with other existing stationary phases for the analysis of intact proteins.
Dillon, T.M.; Bondarenko, P.V.; Rehder, D.S.; Pipes, G.D.; Kleemann, G.R.; Speed Ricci, M.; J. Chromatogr. A 2006, –120. Optimization of a reversedphase high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method for characterizing recombinant antibody heterogeneity and stability.
Wypych, J.; Li, M.; Guo, A.; Zhang, Z.; Martinez, T.; Allen, M.J.; Fodor, S.; Kelner, D.N.; Flynn, G.C.; Liu, Y.D., Bondarenko, P.V.; Speed Ricci, M.; Dillon, T.M.; Balland, A. J. Biol Chem. 2008, 283, 1. Human IgG2 Antibodies Display Disulfidemediated Structural Isoforms.
Fekete, S.; Rudaz, S.; Veuthey, J-L., Guillarme, D.; J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35, . Impact of mobile phase temperature on recovery and stability of monoclonal antibodies using recent reversed-phase stationary phases.
Stephanie A. Schuster, S.A.; Wagner, B.M.; Boyes, B.E.; Kirkland, J.J. J. Chromatogr. A, 2013, –126. Optimized superficially porous particles for protein separations.
Gilar, M; Daly, A.E.; Kele, M.; Neue, U.D.; Gebler, J.C. J. Chromatogr. A, 2004, 2. Implications of column peak capacity on the separation of complex peptide mixtures in single- and two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography.
Related Products
Related Articles
(5 Mb PDF)
Categories